- The research dealt with the subject of evidence communication, as one of the conditions of the Hadith acceptance, combining the theoretical side with the practical side in each of its factors.
- The research put standard for evidence communication, conditions to be met in the formulas of performance of narrators between the judgment and its communication.
- The research showed the types of performance formulas among narrators in terms of their indications to prove the communication with showing the conditions of the validity of allegation by the clear hearing formulas.
- The research detailed the critics’ difference in the limit which achieve the judgment of validity of the communication among the narrators; whether it is through contemporaryand the possibility of meeting, proving the meeting or proving hearing with stating the proving methods of each of them upon its teller.
- The research explained the general methods to prove the evidence communication among the narrators; whether through the performance formulas, the narrators’ statement or the Hadith critics or etc…
- The research showed the important sources which enable the researcher to reach to prove thecontemporary among the narrators, their meeting, or hearing and how to deal with them.
- The research showed the rules of critics to state the judgment of the evidences communication or non-communication, with stating the applied side which leads to develop the ability of the researcher to give preponderance among their sayings when discrepancy.
|